Google+ Followers

Friday, April 18, 2014

Federal Judge: BLM Engaged In A Criminal Conspiracy Against Ranchers

April 18, 2014 9:54 am  
Court opinion exposes BLM’s true intent against Cliven Bundy
(Info Wars) – For over 20 years, the Bureau of Land Management engaged in a “literal, intentional conspiracy” against Nevada ranchers to force them out of business, according to a federal judge whose court opinion exposes the BLM’s true intent against rancher Cliven Bundy.
In his opinion of United States v. Estate of Hage, U.S. District Court Judge Robert C. Jones reveals that after late Nevada rancher E. Wayne Hage indicated on his 1993 grazing permit renewal that by signing the permit, he was not surrendering his family’s long-standing water and forage rights on the land, the BLM not only rejected the permit but also conspired for decades to both deny his family’s property rights and to destroy their cattle business.
“Based upon E. Wayne Hage’s declaration that he refused to waive his rights — a declaration that did not purport to change the substance of the grazing permit renewal for which he was applying, and which had no plausible legal effect other than to superfluously assert non-waiver of rights — the Government denied him a renewal grazing permit based upon its frankly nonsensical position that such an assertion of rights meant that the application had not been properly completed,” Judge Jones wrote. “After the BLM denied his renewal grazing permit for this reason by letter, the Hages indicated that they would take the issue to court, and they sued the Government in the CFC [Court of Federal Claims.]”
SPECIAL: Join the Tea Party REVOLUTION! The Obama Regime must be dismantled!
And at that point, Jones explained, the BLM refused to consider any further applications from Hage.
“The entire chain of events is the result of the Government’s arbitrary denial of E. Wayne Hage’s renewal permit for 1993–2003, and the effects of this due process violation are continuing,” he stated.
Judge Jones continued:
In 2007, unsatisfied with the outcome thus far in the CFC, the Government brought the present civil trespass action against Hage and the Estate. The Government did not bring criminal misdemeanor trespass claims, perhaps because it believed it could not satisfy the burden of proof in a criminal trespass action, as a previous criminal action against E. Wayne Hage had been reversed by the Court of Appeals. During the course of the present trial, the Government has: (1)invited others, including Mr. Gary Snow, to apply for grazing permits on allotments where the Hages previously had permits, indicating that Mr. Snow could use water sources on such land in which Hage had water rights, or at least knowing that he would use such sources; (2) applied with the Nevada State Engineer for its own stock watering rights in waters on the land despite that fact that the Government owns no cattle nearby and has never intended to obtain any, but rather for the purpose of obtaining rights for third parties other than Hage in order to interfere with Hage’s rights; and (3) issued trespass notices and demands for payment against persons who had cattle pastured with Hage, despite having been notified by these persons and Hage himself that Hage was responsible for these cattle and even issuing such demands for payment to witnesses soon after they testified in this case.
By filing for a public water reserve, the Government in this case sought specifically to transfer to others water rights belonging to the Hages. The Government also explicitly solicited and granted temporary grazing rights to parties who had no preferences under the TGA [Taylor Grazing Act of 1934], such as Mr. Snow, in areas where the Hages had preferences under the TGA.
It is necessary to note that under the TGA, according to Red Canyon Sheep Co. v. Ickes (1938), a rancher whose cattle had previously grazed in the area based upon adjacent land, water rights on the land, etc., has a right to a grazing permit over others who apply for a permit to graze the area without having previously grazed there.
So in this instance, Hage would have priority over Snow for a grazing permit, but the BLM willfully ignored this court ruling.
And after the agency filed for a public water reserve, according to Judge Jones, the BLM “sent trespass notices to people who leased or sold cattle to the Hages, notwithstanding the Hages’ admitted and known control over that cattle, in order to pressure other parties not to do business with the Hages, and even to discourage or punish testimony in the present case.”
“For this reason, the Court has held certain government officials in contempt and referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney’s Office,” he wrote. “In summary, government officials, and perhaps also Mr. Snow, entered into a literal, intentional conspiracy to deprive the Hages not only of their permits but also of their vested water rights.”
“This behavior shocks the conscience of the Court and provides a sufficient basis for a finding of irreparable harm to support the injunction described at the end of this Order.”
So in other words, the BLM willfully attempted to destroy the Hage family’s livelihood because Hage dared to assert his existing rights to the land which his family has held since the late 19th century.
And unfortunately the BLM is attempting to do the exact same thing to Cliven Bundy.
“Has Attorney General Eric Holder prosecuted any federal officials for criminal activity and violation of the Hage family’s constitutionally protected rights? No,” William F. Jasper, senior editor of The New American, wrote on the subject. “Has Sen. Harry Reid denounced this lawlessness and criminal activity by government officials and call upon President Obama and Attorney General Holder to protect the citizens of his state from the depredations of federal officials under their command? No.”
“With attitudes such as those expressed above by Sen. Harry Reid, it is almost a certainty that the recently defused Bundy Ranch standoff will be replayed again — and in the not-too-distant future. And the outcome could be much less amicable for all concerned.”
- See more at:

Tags: INSERT TAGS To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!

Fwd: cannot go on like this.. 3


The Importance of November 2014

A recent speech by Dennis Prager given in Colorado has greatly impressed me. Is the USA the last hope of freedom in the World?
(look it up here:

Considering recent events in the USA, doubts arise. In Nevada, armed agents of the BLM killed cattle, destroyed water troughs and desert tortoises dens (tho one reason given for the “raid” was the endangered tortoise - which isn’t) because the ranchers supposedly owe monies for grazing on BLM land, the same land that they have been using for 130 years. A raid on a Montana company, USA Brass, which recycles shell casings, supposedly because of health concerns (though the EPA and OSHA had given the co. a clean bill of health) wherein federal agents confiscated cell phones and arrested employees (later released.)

Nationally, we are spied upon daily by federal agencies, our phone calls monitored, our banking transactions recorded, and lately even drones are being used to spy on us from above, all in the names of the law and safety. The IRS gave info to the Democrat Party (illegally) to be used against their opponents. Other USA agencies have cooperated to jail individuals, confiscate properties and bank accounts, large Corporations have been given special priveleges and low interest rate loans to keep them in business. Unions have been exempted from rules and Obamacare and given info by agencies to use to force unionization of employees who refused to join unions. Such actions are called “crony capitalism” but is mostly practiced by the socialist Democrat Party and this administration.

Our military allow Muslims to wear turbans, pray daily, but refuse to allow Christians and Chaplains to even mention the name of Christ.
Military personnel are told that “militias” and conservatives are dangerous and responsible for school deaths, etc. despite the evidence that leftists and muslims are our greatest culprits. Officers who do not share the leftist theology are being forced out of the Military and exercises are held to train LEO’s and military how to combat conservatives.

For a man to kill another, they must believe the “other” is evil or a non-entity unworthy of respect. The left demonizes all Christian, Conservative, and American ideals as “evil” so they can rally their followers to fight, legally and illegally, for the victory of socialism.
The GOP has been complaining of the media bias against them for years but socialists own the media and the majority of college campuses. Our own children are indoctrinated to believe the USA is evil and Christianity the enemy of humanity. More than 90% of all media and college professors are voting democrats. We people here in “flyover country” are demonized by the coastal elites who control those media and Universities because we still have non-leftist ideals.

If the senate remains in democrat hands after this next election, replacements for retiring judges of the Supreme court and even more federal judges will be leftist opponents of American ideals. Even more voter fraud will be the results of removing the Electorial College and forcing popular election of  Presidents.

I fear for America because I know the Lord’s wrath cannot be withheld forever.

PL Booth, 4/18/14

Tags: evil,winning,conquerers,leftists,democrts,liars,christianity,conservatism,gop To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!

Dennis Prager in CO, the best speech by far I've heard this year.

Tags: christian,conservative,the left,socialiists,liars,american exeptionalism To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

The Obama Training Ground


Tags: chicago dictionary,corruption,democrats,no hope,tombstone,liars,inc. To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Michael Brown
Recommend this article  What we have is an authentic fabrication and nothing more. 
What exactly does this mean? And should Christians be concerned that a new discovery might contradict the biblical account and undermine their faith?
Actually, the report from scholars working with the Harvard Divinity School found that the manuscript is much younger than previously thought – in other words, it is even further removed from the time of the New Testament than scholars originally believed – meaning that, at most, it is a very late myth without a stitch of historical support.
What the report did say was that there was no evidence that any part of this small manuscript had been forged, so what was written was “authentic” in terms of not being the work of a modern forger.
But the scholars did not determine that the apparent reference to Jesus having a wife was authentic. How could they?
As New Testament scholar Darrell Bock observed back in September, 2012 when the find was first announced, “In the New Testament, the church is presented as the bride of Christ. And then in Gnostic Christianity in particular, there’s a ritual - about which we don't know very much - that portrayed the church as the bride of Christ. So we could simply have a metaphorical reference to the church as the bride, or the wife, of Christ.”
And what if this text recorded Jesus as saying that one of his disciples would be his wife?
Bock explained that, “This would be the first text - out of hundreds of texts that we have about Jesus - that would indicate that he was married, if it’s even saying that. So to suggest that one text overturns multiple texts, and multiple centuries, of what has been said about Jesus and what’s been articulated about him, I think is not a very wise place to go, just simply from a historical point of view.”
Initially, when Harvard professor Karen King learned about this papyrus fragment written in the Coptic language, which was used by the ancient, heretical, Gnostic Christians, she thought it might have been a forgery, as did other scholars, especially from the Vatican. But upon further study, she concluded it was not, dating it to the fourth century A.D.
Yet how seriously should we take a fourth century report about Jesus, who was crucified around 30 A.D., especially when it contradicts every other piece of evidence we have about Jesus up to that time? As Prof. Bock said, this “is not a very wise place to go, just simply from a historical point of view.”
To give you a parallel example, how seriously would future historians take a report written 300 years after Pearl Harbor that contradicted every single report that preceded it, including all reports from all eye witnesses?
But the latest report – the one creating such a stir – claims that the tiny manuscript should not be dated to the fourth century. Instead, scholars have now dated it to approximately 741 A.D., meaning, more than 700 years after the time of Jesus. What kind of “evidence” is this?
It would be similar to historians 1,000 years from now finding a letter written in the year 2510 claiming that George Washington, who died in 1799, was actually an alien from Mars. How seriously would it be taken? (Come to think of it, the Ancient Aliens series has probably made a similar claim already!)
There remains no evidence of any kind that Jesus had a wife (note to the reader: Dan Brown’s fictional The Da Vinci Code is not evidence), and the only thing scholars did was determine that this small papyrus fragment was not a modern forgery, although it was hundreds of years younger than they originally thought.
Of course, it is still not totally clear that the manuscript even claims Jesus had a wife, but we know that within 150 years of the time of Jesus, there were fictional gospels circulating with all kinds of bogus claims. Should it surprise us, then, that many centuries later, another fictitious account with yet another new claim would be written down?
Unfortunately, many casual readers and skeptics now think that some “authentic” new evidence has been discovered supporting the idea that Jesus was married, and even Christians are asking if they should be concerned about this latest find.
Rest assured that nothing has been discovered that even remotely challenges the biblical account, and if this very late text does imply that Jesus had a wife, what we have is an authentic fabrication and nothing more. 

Tags: Christian,anti-christian,liars,jesus,marraige,forgeries,fabrications,BS To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!

Monday, April 14, 2014

FW: Ex-NASA Scientist Shoots Down Global Warming; Red States Ranked 'Most Free'

Subject: Ex-NASA Scientist Shoots Down Global Warming; Red States Ranked 'Most Free'
Click here to view this email as a web page

Insider Report from
Headlines (Scroll down for complete stories):
1. Republican 'Red States' Are the Most Free
2. State Govt Retirees Can Collect $60K-Plus in Benefits
3. Congress Weighs Immigration Reform Despite Native Unemployment
4. Former NASA Scientist: Global Warming Is 'Nonsense'
5. Survey Finds 'Most Content,' 'Most Miserable' US Cities

1. Republican 'Red States' Are the Most Free
A new report assesses the freedom enjoyed by Americans in each state — and reveals that Democratic "blue states" are the least free.
The latest edition of "Freedom in the 50 States" has been released by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. It presents an updated ranking of American states based on how their policies promote freedom in the fiscal, regulatory, and personal realms.
The report "examines state and local government intervention across a wide range of policy categories — from tax burden to court systems, from eminent domain laws to occupational licensing, and from home schooling regulations to drug policy," Mercatus states.
The three basic categories examined are:
  • Fiscal policy, including the tax burden, government spending, and government debt.
  • Regulatory policy, including freedom from tort abuse, property rights protection, labor market freedom, and cable and telecom freedom.
  • Personal freedom, including gun control freedom, alcohol freedom, marriage freedom, gambling freedom, civil liberties, education policy, and campaign finance freedom. Mercatus also considers dozens of "variables," including freedom from nanny laws, seatbelt enforcement, local rent control, motorcycle helmet laws, fireworks laws, trans-fat bans, and tobacco restrictions.
    Taking all these factors into consideration, the report finds that New York is the least free state, ranking at No. 50.
    "New York is by far the least free state in the Union," the report discloses. "It is therefore no surprise that New York residents have been heading for the exits: 9 percent of the state's 2000 population, on net, left the state for another state between 2000 and 2011, the highest such figure in the nation.
    "New York has, by a wide margin, the highest taxes in the country: 14.0 percent of income."
    The second least free state is California, followed in order by New Jersey, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Illinois, and Maryland.
    All of these states voted to re-elect President Barack Obama in 2012.
    The freest state is North Dakota, according to the Mercatus analysis. "The state scores exceptionally well on regulatory and fiscal policy. Moreover, North Dakota scores slightly above average on personal freedom. It is also the state that improved the most over the last decade," and "has very low taxes and government debt."
    North Dakota is followed by South Dakota, Tennessee, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Idaho, and Missouri. All these states except New Hampshire voted for Republican Mitt Romney in the last presidential election.
    Among the larger states, red state Texas ranks No. 14 and blue state Florida, 23.
    "Measuring freedom is important because freedom is valuable to people," the report states. "At the very least, it is valuable to those whose choices are restricted by public policy."
    Editor's Note:

    2. State Govt Retirees Can Collect $60K-Plus in Benefits
    It is an astonishing statistic: In the average state, full-career state government employees collect more in retirement benefits than 72 percent of full-time workers earn on the job in that state.
    An analysis by the American Enterprise Institute refutes the claim by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees that its average member receives a pension of about $19,000 a year.
    The benefit-payments average cited by AFSCME is calculated by including employees who do not spend a full career working for the government, and these short-term employees do receive modest pension benefits, according to Andrew G. Biggs, a resident scholar at the AEI.
    In fact, a full-career state government employee who retired in 2011 or 2012 after 30 to 35 years on the job receives an annual pension benefit of $36,131.
    But retirees in some states receive significantly more. Average annual benefits for a full-career retiree in Nevada reach $64,008; in California, $61,560; in Colorado, $60,420.
    Retirees in most states, including California, are also eligible for Social Security benefits, the AEI points out.
    The lowest pension payment is in Mississippi, $14,844 a year.
    The AEI computed that while the average full-career state government employee has a combined pension and Social Security income higher than 72 percent of full-time employees working in that state, the percentage is higher in a number of states.
    In West Virginia, it's 89 percent; in North Carolina, 88 percent; in four other states, it's 87 percent. And in Oregon, the average full-career retiree collects more than 90 percent of full-time workers in the state.
    State government retirees may also have interest or dividend income, and most public retirees receive health coverage.
    The AEI also calculated that the average full-career state government worker who retires at age 60 and survives until age 84 will receive lifetime pension benefits with a present value of $768,940.
    And in eight states, total lifetime benefits exceed $1 million.
    "Drastic benefit reductions for current retirees would be unfair," AEI concludes, "but reforms that make public- and private-sector pensions more comparable should be on the table."
    Editor's Note:

    3. Congress Weighs Immigration Reform Despite Native Unemployment
    Congress is currently considering immigration reform packages that include work permits for illegal aliens and increases in future legal immigration, yet millions of native-born Americans remain out of work.
    Unemployment is particularly high among native-born adults with modest levels of education, a report from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) disclosed.
    In the fourth quarter of 2013, the unemployment rate (referred to as U-3) among native-born adults who have not completed high school was 16.6 percent, and 8.5 percent for those with only a high school education.
    But the U-6 measure of joblessness also includes those who are not actively looking for work, and those who want full-time work but are forced to settle for a part-time job. The U-6 rate in the last quarter of 2013 was 28.7 percent for native-born adults without a high school education, and 16.5 percent for those with only high school.
    The total number of native-born Americans ages 18 to 65 of any education level not working was 50.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2012, up 8.8 million from 2007 and 14.7 million since 2000.
    The highest U-6 unemployment measure of any group is among U.S.-born blacks ages 18 to 29 who did not finish high school: 57.3 percent.
    In the fourth quarter of last year there were just two working-age native-born Americans holding a job for every one that was not employed.
    "This represents a huge deterioration," the CIS observed, noting that as recently as 2000 there were three natives holding a job for every one not working.
    Meanwhile, according to some estimates there are around 12 million illegal immigrants already in the United States.
    Editor's Note:

    4. Former NASA Scientist: Global Warming Is 'Nonsense'
    A prominent scientist and former NASA researcher has added his voice to those who challenge the "scientific fact" that manmade carbon emissions are causing global warming.
    Dr. Leslie Woodcock is a professor emeritus of chemical thermodynamics at the University of Manchester in England, with a Ph.D. from the University of London, and served as a senior research consultant at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Laboratory in Ohio.
    In an interview with Britain's Yorkshire Evening Post, Woodcock declared: "The theory of 'manmade climate change' is an unsubstantiated hypothesis.
    "The theory is that CO2 emitted by burning fossil fuel causes 'global warming.' In fact, water is a much more powerful greenhouse gas and there is 20 times more of it in our atmosphere [than carbon dioxide].
    "Carbon dioxide has been made out to be some kind of toxic gas but the truth is it's the gas of life. We breathe it out, plants breathe it in. The green lobby has created a do-good industry and it becomes a way of life, like a religion. I understand why people defend it when they have spent so long believing in it."
    Woodcock is also a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry, a founding editor of the journal Molecular Simulation, a recipient of a Max Planck Society Visiting Fellowship, and a former guest scientist at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
    He went on to say: "If you talk to real scientists who have no political interest, they will tell you there is nothing in global warming. It's an industry which creates vast amounts of money for some people.
    "The temperature of the earth has been going up and down for millions of years. If there are extremes, it's nothing to do with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it's not permanent and it's not caused by us. Global warming is nonsense.
    "It's become almost an industry, as a consequence of this professional misconduct by government advisers around the world."
    But he added: "You can't blame ordinary people with little or no science education for wanting to be seen to be good citizens who care about their grandchildren's future and the environment."
    Editor's Note:

    5. Survey Finds 'Most Content,' 'Most Miserable' US Cities
    Gallup-Healthways surveyed hundreds of thousands of people in 189 U.S. metropolitan areas to compile its Well-Being Index, which seeks to determine the American cities where people are the most content — and the most miserable.
    According to the survey, Provo-Orem, Utah, is the happiest, while the least happy is Huntington-Ashland, a metro area on the West Virginia, Kentucky, and Ohio borders.
    The index analyzed a number of factors that contributed to happiness and unhappiness in the cities in 2012 and 2013, including basic needs, health behaviors, work environment, physical and emotional health, and life evaluation.
    An analysis of the index by 24/7 Wall St., which appeared on MSN Money, also examined educational attainment, crime rates, and unemployment rates.
    "While income wasn't a direct measure in the index, differences in incomes were quite prominent between America's most content and miserable areas," MSN Money noted in its article headlined "Welcome to Happyville — or Frowntown."
    In nine of the 10 areas with the highest Well-Being Index, the median household income was higher than the national median in 2012, while in the 10 cities with the lowest Index scores, incomes were lower than the typical American household.
    The nation's five "most content" cities are:
    1. Provo-Orem, Utah. Residents had extremely positive evaluations of their lives, the crime rate was among the lowest in the country, unemployment was just 4 percent last December, and nowhere were people more optimistic about their lives in the next five years.
    2. Boulder, Colo. Residents were among the nation's most educated — 58 percent of adults had at least a bachelor's degree in 2012 in the city that is home to the University of Colorado. Boulder had the lowest percentage of residents with high blood pressure and the third lowest smoking rate.
    3. Fort Collins-Loveland, Colo. Residents were among the most content workers, with a majority saying they felt treated like a partner at work. Residents were also among the healthiest in America, and 61 percent exercise regularly, the second highest rate in the nation.
    4. Honolulu, Hawaii. The city led the nation in several physical health measures, and residents were among the most emotionally healthy Americans. Median household income is high, too — $71,404 in the years studied.
    5. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif. The home of Silicon Valley was the richest metro in the nation in 2012, with a median household income of $90,737. Respondents generally reported enjoying their work and few said they felt depressed.
    Rounding out the top 10:
    6. Ann Arbor, Mich.
    7. Naples-Marco Island, Fla.
    8. San Luis Obispo, Calif.
    9. San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, Calif.
    10. Lincoln, Neb.
    The nation's five "most miserable" cities, according to MSN Money — with No. 1 being the most miserable of all:
    1. Huntington-Ashland, W.Va.-Ky.-Ohio. Respondents were the most likely to report physical problems, with high rates of diabetes and chronic pain. Nearly one in 10 said they had experienced a heart attack, the highest rate in the nation. Huntington also had America's highest obesity rate last year, and scored the worst for emotional health.
    2. Charleston, W.Va. Residents were the most likely to express dissatisfaction with their jobs. Emotional health was low, and the diabetes and high blood pressure rates were high.
    3. Redding, Calif. Residents had extremely negative evaluations of their lives, due perhaps to limited job opportunities. And the city's crime rate was one of the highest in the country.
    4. Spartanburg, S.C. A large proportion of residents were struggling financially in the city, where the median household income was $40,879 in 2012, among the nation's lowest. And few cities had worse scores for overall emotional health.
    5. Hickory-Lenoir-Morgantown, N.C. The median income of $37,364 in 2012 was also one of the lowest in America, and residents were less optimistic about their futures than respondents in all but seven other cities.
    Rounding out the top 10:
    6. Beaumont-Port Arthur, Texas
    7. Columbus, Ga.-Ala.
    8. Shreveport-Bossier City, La.
    9. Mobile, Ala.
    10. Evansville, Ind.-Ky.
    Note: Newsmax magazine is now available on the iPad. Find us in the App Store.
    Editor's Note:

    Editor's Notes:

  • Facebook Twitter YouTube YouTube Forward to a Friend
    This email is never sent unsolicited. You have received this Newsmax email because you subscribed to it or someone forwarded it to you. To opt out, see the links below.


    For information on advertising, please contact Newsmax Advertising Sales via email.


    If this email has been forwarded to you and you would like to sign up, please click here.
    Remove your email address from our list or modify your profile. We respect your right to privacy. View our policy.

    This email was sent by:
    1501 Northpoint Parkway, Suite 104
    West Palm Beach, FL 33407 USA


    This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.

    Below is another articles that suggests the military is being prepared to fight and kill civilians in the USA. Factually, every president tailors his military to reflect his vision BUT the BOzo appears to be actively removing any officer that has anything resembling conservative thoughts and is foolish enough to voice them. Many military have said they would refuse to fire upon civilians but there is precedent for that and there are all too many foreign military here in the USA to be comfortable with. Many links and associated articles can be found through this editorial. Recently, the BLM took an a rancher in Nevada and para-military units all across the country responded when the BLM actually brought two snipers into the fight. Had they simply bought the cows before removing them, there is much less likelyhood the conflict would have escalated, however the CO. Sheriff got involved as he should have and things calmed down. Such types of conflicts are escalating because FEDs continue to expand their own authority, too often without the authorization of congress. BLM, grazing rights, ranchers, farmers, agriculture in general and the EPA will continue to be in conflict unless our wimpy congress critters get their butts off the chairs and actually reign in these unauthorized, illegal land seizures. Of course, fed judges too often ignore the constitution as well.

    EDITORIAL: The Civil War of 2016 U.S. Military Officers Are Told to Plan To Fight Americans

    by reasonvoice
    Wow – this article back on February 8th titled: 160 Armed Citizens Confront Town Council and Say: “Stand Down!” sounds like its exactly what the military is training for… so the U.S. Army could be ordered in to “take care of them” if needed. My God the country is becoming a scary place.
    This isn’t some fringe paper this article was in. This comes right out of the Washington Times and talks about the U.S. Army killing Tee Party folks. Make no mistake – all those articles I’ve been posting for a year and a half, they are now making their way into mainstream media, and no one will say a word about it, mark my words. People should read this and scream bloody murder. There SHOULD be a run a depends diapers 
    Instead, Americans will watch American Idol and be able to recite what each Kardashian wore today. Most, even if they read this article will gloss over it. Pretend for e minute i am SCREAMING IN YOUR EAR! This article talks about he U.S. military exterminating Americans. Judge, Jury, and Executioners…. that really ought to make you begin to pay attention to all I’ve been telling you. Revisit the following links:

    Imagine Tea Party extremists seizing control of a South Carolina town and the Army being sent in to crush the rebellion. This farcical vision is now part of the discussion in professional military circles.
    At issue is an article in the respected Small Wars Journal titled “Full Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A ‘Vision’ of the Future.” It was written by retired Army Col. Kevin Benson of the Army’s University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., and Jennifer Weber, a Civil War expert at the University of Kansas. It posits an “extremist militia motivated by the goals of the ‘tea party’ movement” seizing control of Darlington, S.C., in 2016, “occupying City Hall, disbanding the city council and placing the mayor under house arrest.” The rebels set up checkpoints on Interstate 95 and Interstate 20 looking for illegal aliens. It’s a cartoonish and needlessly provocative scenario.
    The article is a choppy patchwork of doctrinal jargon and liberal nightmare. The authors make a quasi-legal case for military action and then apply the Army’s Operating Concept 2016-2028 to the situation. They write bloodlessly that “once it is put into play, Americans will expect the military to execute without pause and as professionally as if it were acting overseas.” They claim that “the Army cannot disappoint the American people, especially in such a moment,” not pausing to consider that using such efficient, deadly force against U.S. citizens would create a monumental political backlash and severely erode government legitimacy.
    The vision is hard to take seriously. As retired ArmyBrig. Gen. Russell D. Howard, a former professor at West Point, observed earlier in his career, “I am a colonel, colonels write a lot of crazy stuff, but no one listens to colonels, so I don’t see the problem.” Twenty years ago, then-Air Force Lt. Col. Charles J. Dunlap Jr. created a stir with an article in Parameters titled “The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012.” It carried a disclaimer that the coup scenario was “purely a literary device intended to dramatize my concern over certain contemporary developments affecting the armed forces, and is emphatically not a prediction.”
    The scenario presented in Small Wars Journal isn’t a literary device but an operational lay-down intended to present the rationale and mechanisms for Americans to fight Americans. Col. Benson and Ms. Weber contend, “Army officers are professionally obligated to consider the conduct of operations on U.S. soil.” This is a dark, pessimistic and wrongheaded view of what military leaders should spend their time studying.
    A professor at the Joint Forces Staff College was relieved of duty in June for uttering the heresy that the United States is at war with Islam. The Obama administration contended the professor had to be relieved because what he was teaching was not U.S. policy. Because there is no disclaimer attached to the Small Wars piece, it is fair to ask, at least in Col. Benson’s case, whether his views reflect official policy regarding the use of U.S. military force against American citizens.
    Read the article in the Washington Times Here:

    Tags: INSERT TAGS To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
    I honestly don'y know if this is honest and correct or not but this says it well and accurately so far as I AM CONCERNED SO DESERVES TO BE SEEN. I sincerely hope she keeps her job. Such honesty should not be punished, particularly if she manages to keep it politically neutral in the classroom.

    Give this teacher and true American a standing ovation.
    This 4th grade teacher has said it all, and she was brave enough to attach her name to it.
    The White House
    1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
    Washington, DC 20500
    Mr. Obama:
    I have had it with you and your administration, sir. Your conduct on your recent trip overseas has convinced me that you are not an adequate representative of the United States of America collectively or of me personally.

    You are so obsessed with appeasing the Europeans and the Muslim world that you have abdicated the responsibilities of the President of the United States of America . You are responsible to the citizens of the United States . You are not responsible to the peoples of any other country on earth.
    I personally resent that you go around the world apologizing for the United States telling Europeans that we are arrogant and do not care about their status in the world. Sir, what do you think the First World War and the Second World War were all about if not the consideration of the peoples of Europe ? Are you brain dead? What do you think the Marshall Plan was all about? Do you not understand or know the history of the 20th century?
    Where do you get off telling a Muslim country that the United States does not consider itself a Christian country? Have you not read the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States ? This country was founded on Judeo-Christian ethics and the principles governing this country, at least until you came along, come directly from this heritage. Do you not understand this?
    Your bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia is an affront to all Americans. Our President does not bow down to anyone, let alone the king of Saudi Arabia …. You didn’t show Great Britain , our best and one of our oldest allies, the respect they deserve yet you bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia .. How dare you, sir! How dare you!
    You can’t find the time to visit the graves of our greatest generation because you don’t want to offend the Germans but make time to visit a mosque in Turkey …… You offended our dead and every veteran when you give the Germans more respect than the people who saved the German people from themselves. What’s the matter with you? I am convinced that you and the members of your administration have the historical and intellectual depth of a mud puddle and should be ashamed of yourselves, all of you.
    You are so self-righteously offended by the big bankers and the American automobile manufacturers yet do nothing about the real thieves in this situation, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Frank, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelic, the Fannie Mae bonuses, and the Freddie Mac bonuses. What do you intend to do about them? Anything? I seriously doubt it.
    What about the U.S. House members passing out $9.1 million in bonuses to their staff members on top of the $2.5 million in automatic pay raises that lawmakers gave themselves? I understand the average House aide got a 17% bonus. I took a 5% cut in my pay to save jobs with my employer. You haven’t said anything about that. Who authorized that? I surely didn’t!
    Executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be receiving $210 million in bonuses over an eighteen-month period, that’s $45 million more than the AIG bonuses. In fact, Fannie and Freddie executives have already been awarded $51 million not a bad take. Who authorized that and why haven’t you expressed your outrage at this group who are largely responsible for the economic mess we have right now?

    I resent that you take me and my fellow citizens as brain-dead and not caring about what you idiots do. We are watching what you are doing and we are getting increasingly fed up with all of you.
    I also want you to know that I personally find just about everything you do and say to be offensive to every one of my sensibilities. I promise you that I will work tirelessly to see that you do not get a chance to spend two terms destroying my beautiful country.
    Every real American
    P.S. I rarely ask that emails be ‘passed around’…

    It’s past time for all Americans to wake up!
    Ms Kathleen Lyday
    Fourth Grade Teacher
    Grandview Elementary School
    11470 Hwy . C
    Hillsboro , MO 63050

    (This woman may lose her job for this letter.. I believe we owe it to her for expressing the outrage that we feel but often fail to address.)
    This blogger agrees with this woman tho doing so just naturally brands us racist in the eyes of democrats and other socialist liberals.

    Tags: School teacher,liberlas,obama's descent,BOzo,pathological liar,USA,conservatism To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!

    Saturday, April 12, 2014

    Michael Brown
    Recommend this article   Here is an important read and just plain truth about the Arabs, Muslims haters, and the non-existent palestinian state. They could have had a home state were their neighbors willing but they aren't and muslim hatred brought on and supported by the so-called palestinian leadership which is both incompetent and corrupt will keep that people in poverty and distress mainly because doing so serves the hatred better.
    There is no doubt that there is real suffering among the Palestinians living in Gaza and the West Bank (which is actually ancient Judea and Samaria). The question is who, precisely, is most responsible for their suffering?
    Certainly, Israel is far from blameless in its treatment of the Palestinians, and it helps no one when we overlook or whitewash Israel’s failings, as some Christian Zionists are prone to do.
    But is Israel primarily responsible for the difficult living conditions faced by the Palestinians today? Absolutely not. The blame lays squarely at the feet of the Palestinian leadership.
    Consider that in 1936, Haj Amin Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, later a collaborator with Hitler and the father of many of today’s radical Islamic movements, had this to say about living in peace with the neighboring Jews: “There is no place in Palestine for two races. The Jews left Palestine 2,000 year ago, let them go to other parts of the world, where there are wide vacant places.”
    In contrast, in 1937, David Ben Gurion, later to be Israel’s first Prime Minister, said, “We do not wish and do not need to expel Arabs and take their place. All our aspiration is built on the assumption – proven throughout all our activity in the Land of Israel – that there is enough room in the country for ourselves and the Arabs.”
    Ten years later, when the U.N. had proposed separate states for the Jews and the Arabs, Golda Meir said, “We are happy and ready for what lies ahead. Our hands are extended in peace to our neighbors. Both States can live in peace with one another and cooperate for the welfare of their inhabitants.”
    And Ben Gurion invited the Arabs living in what would be the new state of Israel to remain among them as partners (which many of them did, and they have grown from 200,000 then to 1.6 million today): “If the Arab citizen will feel at home in our state . . . if the state will help him in a truthful and dedicated way to reach the economic, social, and cultural level of the Jewish community, then Arab distrust will accordingly subside and a bridge will be built to a Semitic, Jewish-Arab alliance.”
    In stark contrast, Azzam Pasha, Secretary of the Arab League, would have none of it, calling instead for an all-out war against Israel: “It will be a war of annihilation. It will be a momentous massacre in history that will be talked about like the massacres of the Mongols or the Crusades.”
    And so, the five surrounding Arab nations attacked Israel and were defeated in a war that was costly and difficult for everyone, resulting in about 800,000 Jewish refugees who fled from the neighboring Muslim countries and about 600,000 Arab refugees who fled from the war on Israel.
    What happened to those refugees? Most of the Jewish refugees were absorbed by the fledgling State of Israel; the Arab refugees were not absorbed by their neighboring countries.
    Why? Because they were used as human pawns against Israel, to the point that in 1959, the Arab League passed Resolution 1457: “The Arab countries will not grant citizenship to applicants of Palestinian origin in order to prevent their assimilation into the host countries.”
    That’s why, until this very day, there are hundreds of thousands of Palestinians living in refugee camps in countries like Lebanon and Syria, never integrated into the larger population or absorbed as citizens with full rights.
    How dare the anti-Zionists blame Israel for this atrocious treatment of the Palestinians. The fault lies with their own leaders who have betrayed them in their hatred of Israel. (This is why historian Efraim Karsh entitled his very important book Palestine Betrayed, where much more relevant information can be found.)
    As recently as 2004, Hisham Youssef, spokesman for the 22-nation Arab League, stated that, “Palestinians live in very bad conditions. That official policy is meant to preserve their Palestinian identity. If every Palestinian who sought refuge in a certain country was integrated and accommodated into that country, there won’t be any reason for them to return to Palestine.”
    Do these leaders really care about their suffering brothers and sisters, or is their opposition to Israel, fueled by the theology of radical Islam, more important to them?
    In 2012, the Palestinian Mufti, one of the senior Islamic leaders, repeated a well-known Muslim Hadith (authoritative tradition): “The Hour [of Resurrection] will not come until you fight the Jews. The Jew will hide behind stones or trees. Then the stones or trees will call: ‘Oh Muslim, servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.’”
    More recently, in a recent program on Hamas’ Al-Aqsa TV, Hamas cleric and parliamentary member Yunis Al-Astal cited the Quran in guiding Muslims to “massacre” the Jews. (See for more details.)
    With statements like this, which are seconded by many Palestinian leaders, does Israel really have a peace partner among the Palestinian leadership?
    As journalist Caroline Glick wrote, “Nearly every day a Palestinian leader announces that the Palestinians will not make peace with Israel under any circumstances. These statements are part of the public record, and all are published to great approval in the Arabic media. Palestinian children regularly appear on PA-controlled television children’s programs, calling for the annihilation of Israel and demonizing Jews as subhuman. Summer camps are named after terrorists.”
    And as Israel has released thousands of Palestinian prisoners as a gesture of peace, even though many of these prisoners have the blood of Israeli men, women, and children on their hands, they are hailed as heroes when they return home. This is a terribly painful slap in Israel’s face, and yet another stumblingblock to peace.
    As for the billions of dollars of support that pours into Hamas and the Palestinian Authority from America and Europe, only a small portion of it finds its ways into the hands of the people, instead being used to pad the bank accounts of the leaders and to further their war on Israel.
    Of course, as followers of Jesus we should care for both Palestinians and Israelis, and we should give ourselves wholeheartedly to bring justice to the victims and relief to the suffering, whoever they may be.
    But let us not forget where the ultimate blame lies for the suffering of the Palestinian people: It lies at the feet of their leadership, and shifting the blame to Israel will do these suffering Palestinians no good at all

    Tags: jews,muslims,arabs,palestinians,hatred,corruption,mental illness,false religion To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!