Wednesday, March 31, 2010

From PRAVDA - English Edfition A MUST READ!

 
 From PRAVDA - English Edfition A MUST READ!



-----Original Message-----
From: Betty Busby [mailto:Betty.Busby@blackrivertech.org]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 1:00 PM
To: Gayle Burns; Audumn Rice; Larry Dail; Lesa Grooms; janice mead; beth coon
Subject: FW: From PRAVDA - English Edfition A MUST READ!



-----Original Message-----
From: ted.dail@farmersinsurance.com [mailto:ted.dail@farmersinsurance.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 8:52 AM
To: cd4vb@allstate.com; ravenhome172@yahoo.com; Betty Busby;
busbybetha@hotmail.com; ramona.lillard@farmersinsurance.com;
philt@arkansaspackaging.com; charles.cagle@yahoo.com
Subject: Fw: From PRAVDA - English Edfition A MUST READ!


Ted L. Dail
Special Claim Representative
Cellular 870-809-0133
Fax 870-878-6858

"It is wise to walk with someone who knows the way"
----- Forwarded by Ted L Dail/OKCDC/Farmers/USA/Zurich on 03/28/2010 08:49 AM
-----







Date: Thursday, March 25, 2010, 8:42 PM













Hmmm ....











Subject: FW: From PRAVDA - English Edfition A MUST READ!









This is amazing stuff! Checked it out on www.snopes.com. Copy the name of
its author, Stanislav Mishin, into
the search engine, and you'll find, sure enough, it all happens to be
completely true. Isn't it ironic that we
have accessed this from a RUSSIAN newspaper instead of one of our own?





The irony of this article appearing in the English edition of Pravda (Russian
on-line newspaper, not the
"original" Pravda) defies description. Why can a Russian newspaper print the
following yet the American media
can't/won't see it?



(Embedded image moved to file: pic17421.jpg)cid:1.3225616794@web56005.mail.re3.yahoo.com







American Capitalism Gone With A Whimper



(Embedded image moved to file: pic18716.jpg)cid:2.3225616794@web56005.mail.re3.yahoo.com

It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American descent
into Marxism is happening with
breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple,
excuse me dear reader, I meant
people.



True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century,
especially the past twenty years.
The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody
test it was. But we Russians would
not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much
money Wall Street poured into the
fists of the Marxists.



Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace
for the surrender of their freedoms
and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters.



First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard
education system based on pop
culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV
dramas than the drama in DC that
directly affects their lives. They care more for their "right" to choke down a
McDonalds burger or a Burger
King burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and
lecture us about our rights and
about our "democracy". Pride blind the foolish.



Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of
thousands of different "branches and
denominations" were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and
their televangelists and top
protestant mega preachers were more than happy to sell out their souls and
flocks to be on the "winning" side
of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but
when explained that they would be
on the "winning" side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in
hopes for earthly power. Even our
Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America .



The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in
the past three months has been
truly impressive. His spending and money printing has been a record setting,
not just in America 's short
history but in the world. If this keeps up for more than another year, and
there is no sign that it will not,
America at best will resemble the Weimar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe .



These past two weeks have been the most breath taking of all. First came the
announcement of a planned
redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it
to bankroll their thefts,
losses, and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our
Russian oligarchs look little more
then ordinary street thugs, in comparison. Yes, the Americans have beat our
own thieves in the shear volumes.
Should we congratulate them?



These men, of course, are not an elected panel but made up of appointees
picked from the very financial
oligarchs and their henchmen who are now gorging themselves on trillions of
American dollars, in one bailout
after another. They are also usurping the rights, duties, and powers of the
American congress (parliament).
Again, congress has put up little more than a whimper to their masters.



Then came Barack Obama's command that GM's (General Motors) president step
down from leadership of his company.
That is correct, dear reader, in the land of "pure" free markets, the American
president now has the power, the
self-given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees of private
companies, at will. Come hither,
go dither, the centurion commands his minions.



So it should be no surprise that the American president has followed this up
with a "bold" move of declaring
that he and another group of unelected, chosen stooges will now redesign the
entire automotive industry and
will even be the guarantee of automobile policies. I am sure that if given
the chance, they would happily try
and redesign it for the whole of the world, too. Prime Minister Putin, less
then two months ago, warned Obama
and UK 's Blair, not to follow the path to Marxism, it only leads to disaster.
Apparently, even though we
suffered 70 years of this Western sponsored horror show, we know nothing, as
foolish, drunken Russians, and so
let our "wise" Anglo-Saxon fools find out the folly of their own pride.



Again, the American public has taken this with barely a whimper...but a "free
man" whimper.


So, should it be any surprise to discover that the Democratically controlled
Congress of America is working on
passing a new regulation that would give the American Treasury department the
power to set "fair" maximum
salaries, evaluate performance, and control how private companies give out pay
raises and bonuses? Senator
Barney Frank, a social pervert basking in his homosexuality (of course,
amongst the modern, enlightened
American societal norm, as well as that of the general West, homosexuality is
not only not a looked down upon
life choice, but is often praised as a virtue) and his Marxist enlightenment,
has led this effort. He
stresses that this only affects companies that receive government monies, but
it is retroactive and taken to a
logical extreme, this would include any company or industry that has ever
received a tax break or incentive.


The Russian owners of American companies and industries should look
thoughtfully at this and the option of
closing their facilities down and fleeing the land of the Red as fast as
possible. In other words, divest while
there is still value left.



The proud American will go down into his slavery without a fight, beating his
chest, and proclaiming to the
world, how free he really is. The world will only snicker.



Stanislav Mishin© 1999-2009... PRAVDA.Ru. When reproducing our materials in
whole or in part, hyperlink to
PRAVDA.Ru should be made. The opinions and views of the authors do not always
coincide with the point of view
of PRAVDA.Ru's editors.







***** PLEASE NOTE ***** This E-Mail/telefax message and any documents
accompanying this transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential
information and is intended solely for the
addressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended addressee/recipient, you
are hereby notified that any use of, disclosure, copying, distribution, or
reliance on the contents of this E-Mail/telefax information is strictly
prohibited and may result in legal action against you. Please reply to the
sender advising of the error in transmission and immediately delete/destroy the
message and any accompanying documents. Thank
you.*****

HOLT: LINCOLN'S 60TH VOTE "DIVIDED OUR NATION"

 
 HOLT: LINCOLN'S 60TH VOTE "DIVIDED OUR NATION"

 
 
 
From: Ted Dail Subject:
 


Please Note: You have NOT been added to any email lists. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, please contact ted.dail@farmersinsurance.com.

JIM HOLT FOR U.S. SENATE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: February 23, 2010
CONTACT: Dwayne Andregg (479) 439-1347
  dwaynea@jimholt2010.com

HOLT: LINCOLN'S 60TH VOTE "DIVIDED OUR NATION"

SPRINGDALE, AR — Republican US Senate Candidate Jim Holt called Senator Blanche Lincoln's announcement today that she would be voting against the Healthcare Reconciliation Bill a "fraud" and a "Fig Leaf" to cover up her crucial 60th vote to proceed with Obama Care.
"With a single vote she has divided our Nation right down the middle and we are poised below an avalanche that can only be stopped if we act now." Holt Said "Lincoln's comments that the House Package 'includes matter unrelated to health care' is imbecilic. The package that the Senate originally sent back to the house was full of this 'unrelated matter.' The Federal Government is bound by article one section nine of the Constitution to not favor one state above another."
Holt continued "Blanche Lincoln lit the match that burned the Constitution. Her crucial 60th vote for cloture last December sent a clear and undeniable message to the American people that she will continue to adhere to Washington's liberal agenda despite what the voters in Arkansas want, or what the supreme law of the land says."
It's not only time for a change in Washington, it's time to send Washington a message. The clearest message Arkansas can send Washington is in sending Jim Holt to the US Senate.
Holt concluded: "America's Future is worth fighting for. That's why I am running for the US Senate. Our Nation must be saved."
###
 

Citizenship, A Birthright? Maybe Not.

 
 



A Birthright? Maybe Not.
George Will
Sunday, March 28, 2010
WASHINGTON -- A simple reform would drain some scalding steam from immigration arguments that may soon again be at a roiling boil. It would bring the interpretation of the 14th Amendment into conformity with what the authors of its text intended, and with common sense, thereby removing an incentive for illegal immigration.
To end the practice of "birthright citizenship," all that is required is to correct the misinterpretation of that amendment's first sentence: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." >From these words has flowed the practice of conferring citizenship on children born here to illegal immigrants.
A parent from a poor country, writes professor Lino Graglia of the University of Texas law school, "can hardly do more for a child than make him or her an American citizen, entitled to all the advantages of the American welfare state." Therefore, "It is difficult to imagine a more irrational and self-defeating legal system than one which makes unauthorized entry into this country a criminal offense and simultaneously provides perhaps the greatest possible inducement to illegal entry."
Writing in the Texas Review of Law and Politics, Graglia says this irrationality is rooted in a misunderstanding of the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." What was this intended or understood to mean by those who wrote it in 1866 and ratified it in 1868? The authors and ratifiers could not have intended birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants because in 1868 there were and never had been any illegal immigrants because no law ever had restricted immigration.
If those who wrote and ratified the 14th Amendment had imagined laws restricting immigration -- and had anticipated huge waves of illegal immigration -- is it reasonable to presume they would have wanted to provide the reward of citizenship to the children of the violators of those laws? Surely not.
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 begins with language from which the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause is derived: "All persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States." (Emphasis added.) The explicit exclusion of Indians from birthright citizenship was not repeated in the 14th Amendment because it was considered unnecessary. Although Indians were at least partially subject to U.S. jurisdiction, they owed allegiance to their tribes, not the United States. This reasoning -- divided allegiance -- applies equally to exclude the children of resident aliens, legal as well as illegal, from birthright citizenship. Indeed, today's regulations issued by the departments of Homeland Security and Justice stipulate:
"A person born in the United States to a foreign diplomatic officer accredited to the United States, as a matter of international law, is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. That person is not a United States citizen under the 14th Amendment."
Sen. Lyman Trumbull of Illinois was, Graglia writes, one of two "principal authors of the citizenship clauses in 1866 act and the 14th Amendment." He said that "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" meant subject to its "complete" jurisdiction, meaning "not owing allegiance to anybody else." Hence children whose Indian parents had tribal allegiances were excluded from birthright citizenship.
Appropriately, in 1884 the Supreme Court held that children born to Indian parents were not born "subject to" U.S. jurisdiction because, among other reasons, the person so born could not change his status by his "own will without the action or assent of the United States." And "no one can become a citizen of a nation without its consent." Graglia says this decision "seemed to establish" that U.S. citizenship is "a consensual relation, requiring the consent of the United States." So: "This would clearly settle the question of birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens. There cannot be a more total or forceful denial of consent to a person's citizenship than to make the source of that person's presence in the nation illegal."
Congress has heard testimony estimating that more than two-thirds of all births in Los Angeles public hospitals, and more than half of all births in that city, and nearly 10 percent of all births in the nation in recent years, have been to illegal immigrant mothers. Graglia seems to establish that there is no constitutional impediment to Congress ending the granting of birthright citizenship to persons whose presence here is "not only without the government's consent but in violation of its law."

Copyright © 2010 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.

The CBS Poll results on BO's first year in office. It isn't pretty.

The Economy
A:
3.94%
B:
4.24%
C:
5.21%
D:
17.90%
F:
68.71%
Foreign Policy
A:
5.88%
B:
3.99%
C:
7.91%
D:
22.28%
F:
59.94%
Health Care
A:
5.89%
B:
2.89%
C:
2.96%
D:
8.57%
F:
79.68%
Afghanistan
A:
5.14%
B:
13.97%
C:
26.71%
D:
22.85%
F:
31.33%
Iraq
A:
5.16%
B:
10.25%
C:
25.38%
D:
23.88%
F:
35.34%
Threat of Terrorism
A:
5.84%
B:
4.66%
C:
9.69%
D:
21.56%
F:
58.25%
Energy and the Environment
A:
4.90%
B:
5.11%
C:
12.53%
D:
21.12%
F:
56.34%
Social Issues
A:
5.80%
B:
4.56%
C:
11.20%
D:
19.39%
F:
59.05%
Bipartisanship
A:
5.76%
B:
2.94%
C:
3.97%
D:
8.25%
F:
79.07%
Obama's Overall Job as President
A:
5.35%
B:
3.87%
C:
3.76%
D:
22.92%
F:
64.10%

NOTE: This is not a scientific poll. The results above are for information purposes only, and should not be confused with the results of the scientific polls conducted by CBS News.